Home > Ask a Question > BBS > Architecture > To designate or not to designate?

Architecture

Not Logged in.
Moderator Moderated by Handyman Login | Register
RSS
Page: [1]
Font Size:
   View Style: Flat    Tree
Post Reply | Post New Message
Title/Content Author

To designate or not to designate?

09/10/2003 11:19 AM cj.mizner

I have a home that qualifies for historic designation. Can anybody that has done this give me a run down of the pros and cons of getting it designated and is it worth it?

Member Since
12/23/2002

Total Contributions
5 Posts

Post Reply | Watch this Topic

To designate or not to designate?

09/12/2003 08:03 AM treebeard

Haven't been there myself. But having been in the construction/renovation business for some time, I'd suggest that before you take that step you make certain you understand the rules. Once the house and land are designated as 'historic', in most if not all jurisdictions, there are fairly strict rules about what you can and can not do with and to the house. Renovation, for instance, like a new kitchen, can take on a whole different character regarding the process for permission and design.

Member Since
01/15/2003

Total Contributions
265 Posts

Post Reply | Watch this Topic
Page: [1]






 

About | FAQ | Contact | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Help
© BobVila.com 2008